Kingston Vision

English: Statue of Robert Baldwin and Louis-Hi...
Statue of Robert Baldwin and Louis-Hippolyte Lafontaine by Walter Seymour Allward, Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


When Upper and Lower Canada were united in 1840, there were many difficult problems.  Lower Canada had a population of 600,000 and was relatively debt-free.  The French-speaking Canadians claimed they were being placed under an English dictator, Governor Sydenham, and that Montreal was being annexed to Upper Canada.  Upper Canada had a population of only 400,000 and had piled up a huge debt for those days through the building of roads and canals.  English-speaking opponents of Union believed that they would be dominated by the French.

Three was also the problem of where the capital should be.  Kingston was chosen as a compromise.  Quebec was too far to the east and too French.  Toronto was too far to the west, and too English.  The new Parliament opened on June 14, 1841, in a hospital!  The assembly rooms were airy, members had desks and chairs, and Governor Sydenham claimed they were more comfortable than the members of Parliament in Britain.

French Canada was shocked when Sydenham did not include one of its representatives in his executive council, and only eight French-speaking members in the legislative council of twenty-four.  Sydenham claimed that he could not find enough French-Canadian of ability who had not been identified with the rebellion in Lower Canada in 1837-1838.

On the first day of the session, Robert Baldwin, who was leader of the Reform Party in Upper Canada which had a majority, insisted that Sydenham should remove the Tories  from the Council and replace them with Reformers, including representatives from Lower Canada.  Sydenham refused and so Baldwin resigned from the Council.  He and Louis Hippolyte Lafontaine, leader of the Reform Party in Lower Canada, then joined together to lead the Opposition.  Lafontaine had been one of the rebels who had fled to the United States.  By a strange quirk of fate, he was to become the first joint premier of United Canada.

There was an interesting sidelight to the Baldwin-Lafontaine alliance.  Baldwin offered Lafontaine, defeated in Lower Canada, a safe seat in York.   Two years later Lafontaine found a safe seat for Baldwin in Rimouski.  It was one of the first examples of co-operation between French- and English-speaking Canadians.

There are a few sites I can recommend to learn a bit more. The first is Tymparon Inn who put together a great page. You can be assured of an informative article at The Canadian Encyclopedia. Lastly, I found this site that has an extensive information is Old and Sold.


  1. Maybe it’s because it’s Friday but when I looked at the statue, I saw and heard this. Note what Baldwin has in his hand…
    Baldwin: Hey Lou, look at this new iPad I just got!
    Lafontaine: Yeah, Bob, but I’m more of an Android user myself.
    Baldwin: Fine! You can’t run in York then.
    Lafontaine: (thinks) Why do all those Apple users have to be such snobs?


  2. I remember the time when Quebec wanted to separate and there was an election about this. I was in the Opera and all off a sudden, a flash of news came up. The vote was so close that Quebec will remain with Canada. Thundering Applause not because of the Opera and I cried.

    See what happens when I read your post, it brings so much emotion. Thanks, Tk. 😛


        • However autonomous the Quebeckers think they are, we are nonetheless a better country with the flavour of Quebec in it. And then there’s the basics, like trade … and a host of other issues. I left Quebec because of politics, but I am happy that the proposal didn’t go through. And from what I’ve been reading, the vote wouldn’t be so close if they voted today. Even the French / English issues are not as they once were — even if an Italian restaurant cannot sell “pasta”!

          You been to Quebec? Or shall we resume our “dreaming”?? 🙂


  3. An interesting compromise. I can’t help wondering though what the hospital staff did when they had to meet if the meeting rooms were occupied by Parliament.


Let me know what's on your mind

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.