“One Flag, One Fleet, One Throne”

English: Canadian Prime Minister Robert Borden...
Canadian Prime Minister Robert Borden (1854-1937) and Winston Churchill (then First Lord of the Admiralty) in 1912. Location unknown.(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

The importance of this story is its anti-climax, which occurred on May 30.

For three years, the Commons had discused the question of naval help for Britain.  When the Liberals were in power, Sir Wilfrid Laurier had proposed that Canada should build a navy. This was opposed by the Conservatives under Sir Robert Borden, who said that this was disloyal to Britain.  Instead, Canada should give Britain money to build battleships.  Winston Churchill was then First Lord of the Admiralty.  He made a deal with Sir Robert Borden to send him two messages: one confidential, outlining the military facts, the other for public consumption.

The Quebec Nationalists under Henri Bourassa supported the Conservatives, not because they wanted to help Britain, but because they opposed the building of a Canadian navy.

The Conservatives won the election in 1911 with the slogan: “One Flag, One Fleet, One Throne,” and now Sir Wilfrid Laurier, as leader of the Opposition, asked them what they were going to do about the navy, or naval aid for Britain.

Sir Robert Borden introduced a measure to give Britain $35 million to build British battleships.  He quoted Churchill as saying that it would be foolhardy and presumptuous for Canada to go ahead and build a navy for which it did not have trained men.

The Liberals trying to force another election on the issue, launched the biggest filibuster in the history of the Canadian House of Commons. They kept the House in session twenty-four hours a day for two weeks, with the exception of one Sunday when there was an armistice (truce – cease-fire).  Both parties divided their members into eight-hour shifts.  Liberals who hadn’t spoken for years took their turns, quoting the Bible, reading the British North America Act, or Janes Fighting Ships (the bible of shipping), or anything even remotely relevant.

Eventually, Sir Robert ended the debate by invoking the “closure” for the first time in Canada.  Closure might be described as a political measure to make prolonged debate impossible, and is used only as a last resort.  Sir Robert managed to push his navy bill through the House of Commons and avoid an election.

The anti-climax?  On May 30, 1913, the Senate killed the bill!

As you can imagine, there’s a bit more to this story. To read more, I suggest Filibusters in the Canadian House of Commons, and House of Commons Procedure and practice (a bit dry, but informative, directly from the Government of Canada’s website). You may also want to visit Wikipedia to learn about filibusters in general.

8 comments

  1. I’m a fan of Churchill in general, but in this case he was wrong. Well, it might have been right for GB, but it wasn’t right for Canada.
    I guess there’s at least one historical example of the senate being useful. 🙂

    Like

Let me know what's on your mind

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.